Blue Jeans

Combating climate change

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Email this to someone

The rise of right-wing leaders across the globe has made millions of people become aware of the dangers of authoritarianism, white supremacism, and free-market capitalism. But most of the contemporary issues that have been put under the spotlight are all related to human rights, identity politics, and economic policies. Rarely do we talk about the biggest and most serious problem we are facing as a species: Climate change.

It was in 1979 when the world’s most powerful leaders assembled in Geneva, Switzerland for the very first World Climate Conference (WCC) to discuss global warming and how we should utilize our current knowledge on climate systems in social and economic development planning. Thirty-eight years, three WCCs, and 22 United Nations Conferences of the parties later, we have made admirable progress towards mitigating the causes of anthropogenic climate change while adapting to its effects. All over the world, we have harnessed renewable energy with the use of solar panels and wind turbines, reformed the agricultural sector, and conducted large-scale tree planting activities in tropical areas. But the question remains: Are these efforts enough to prevent and combat the worst impacts of global climate change?

The answer is no. While we have made great strides towards environment-friendly and climate-resilient development, the call for grander and more radical action is stronger than ever. The most effective of these solutions: Taxing carbon emissions.

A carbon tax is a fee imposed on burning fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum, crude oil, and natural gas. Enacting a legal policy that will penalize large-scale air polluters (especially industrial companies in China, the United States, and India) is the only way to make the largest emitters of carbon dioxide, methane, and other carbon-based greenhouse gases accountable for the damages they have done to our natural environment. Economically speaking, such policy has the potential to greatly reduce the demand for and use of fossil fuels in electricity generation and transportation as private companies would prefer and shift to using climate-friendly and energy-efficient technologies to eliminate costs of using fossil fuels. However, this would possibly be the most challenging political endeavor any government can undertake.

It is a fact that in almost every country in the world, national governments and public officials are used by multinational corporations to further their business interests. For example, according to Earthjustice, a non-profit environmental law organization, George W. Bush and the entire Republican Party’s campaign for the 2000 US national elections was funded with more than USD 740,000 by Exxon Mobil and BP Amoco plc (two of the world’s largest oil and gas companies) as well as US-based energy corporation ConocoPhillips. Furthermore, these companies also donated a total of USD 305,000 for Bush’s presidential inauguration in January 2001. Two months later, President Bush, motivated by corporate-funded campaigns against climate change research, announced the withdrawal of US from the Kyoto Protocol.

The problem is not so much about enacting and implementing laws that will penalize large-scale carbon emitters for their harmful business operations as it is about the very system that these entities operate in, especially when government officials are either affiliated with or sponsored by big-time capitalists. And so, more than crafting and enforcing environmental laws, what needs to be done is a major structural overhaul. We need to abandon neoliberal capitalism and shift to a new economic system that will prevent all members of the society, especially the private sector, from abusing our environment.

Perhaps the most dangerous practice of the current neoliberal capitalist system that we urgently need to abandon is privatization, which is related to environmental degradation as well as human rights violations.

Privatization entails giving every right to a private owner to do whatever they desire with their property or company. This often leads to activities that have negative externalities on communities and the natural environment. Case in point: Private mining operations in the Philippines that have resulted to the displacement of indigenous peoples communities, water pollution, deforestation, and ecosystem destruction.

Other policies of the current economic system that are equally damaging to the environment include deregulation, free trade, and austerity. A quick Google search will provide you real cases of how these neoliberal policies have damaged our natural environment.

We will fail to achieve our global commitment to combating anthropogenic climate change if we continue to resort to band-aid solutions and parliamentary reforms. What we need to do is to replace the very system that allowed these environmental problems to exist in the first place. And we need it now. Otherwise, the future of humanity will remain threatened by the gravest impacts of climate change.

Nable is the current 4 BS Environmental Science Representative in the Sanggunian.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This is for Adam Smith.

    Okay, but first, I have two words for you: Fuck. You.

    First of all, the fact that you have placed authoritarianism, white supremacism, and free-market capitalism as "dangers" millions of people becoming aware of has sharply stabbed me in the chest. However, let us not delve too much in that.

    You then seemed to go on, talking about how a carbon tax should be imposed to deter damages to the natural environment. This seems to sound very pleasing to the ideal socialist's ears, but the problem with a carbon tax is that the consumers shall pay the price. The oil companies would lose profit, therefore they have to raise the prices for their oil and gasoline to keep up. This seems bad, but I shall talk later on how this might be good.

    Then, the crux of your argument: we need to do a "major structural overhaul", by abandoning neoliberal capitalism. You then seem to say that we need to abandon privatization, stating that it leads to environmental degradation and human rights violations. You then seem to associate privatization with ultimate sovereignty towards that land, which shall mean water pollution, deforestation, and ecosystem

    You seem to show full ignorance on Law (see: RA 7942). The capitalist owning land does not automatically guarantee that they can do anything with that land. For example, I cannot torture people in my house! The same goes for land allocated for mining, wherein corporations should subscribe to a set of laws. The State still owns that Land, but it is under the hand of the private corporation.

    You also seem to show some sort of anti-capitalist rhetoric, as shown in your "major structural overhaul" and associating free-market capitalism as a "danger". I shall no longer preach about the benefits capitalism has given both to the rich and to the poor, but what I aim to say is that, instead of replacing neoliberal capitalism, we should instead improve on it: for example, look up "green capitalism". We should instead make good of what we have, instead of destroying what has given us freedom to make and be. We should, for example, give incentives to greener options, such as imposing the carbon tax to force companies to look for greener alternatives.

    And only laissez-faire neoliberal capitalism can make that happen.

    Full disclosure: I own no stock from private mining corporations or anything similar. In actuality, my family isn't wealthy at all. I am just here to defend the values of laissez-faire capitalism, and the rights of the capitalists (they're humans too!).

      Street Activist

      You seem to show full ignorance on reality, my dear. Corporations do not care about laws; they only care about profit-making. Land-grabbing is widespread even with R.A. 8371 (The Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act of 1997) in place. We have R.A. 9275 (Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004), but look at Pasig River, Manila Bay, and other bodies of water all over the country.

      Laissez-faire neoliberal capitalism is the root of all environmental problems we are facing now. Stop deluding yourself that it's going to save the planet.